Search for: All records

Secretive species are difficult to study and often of conservation concern, as exemplified by the Eastern Hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis). Traditional methods for sampling Hellbenders involves moving rocks, which damages essential habitat. Use and installation of artificial shelters has made studying Hellbenders less dangerous for the animal and less disruptive to stream habitat; however, researchers using shelters generally capture occupying animals to identify them. We tested the ability of a submersible portable Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) antenna to accurately detect PIT-tagged Hellbenders in shelters. We tested the effects of the presence and depth of cover rocks on top of shelters, PIT tag location within the shelter, and tag orientation on detection efficiency of Hellbenders. For the 32 shelters occupied by a tagged individual with cover rocks in place, the scanner accurately detected 31% of the animals versus 88% when cover rocks were removed. The detection efficiency of the scanner dropped below 50% once cover rock depth exceeded 11 cm. Tags placed near the interface of the entrance tunnel and chamber, or along the chamber walls, had higher detection efficiencies than those in other locations within the shelter. Vertically oriented tags were 18% more likely to be detected than horizontally oriented tags. Our study demonstrates that while this technology has certain limitations, it shows potent 

Abstract Artificial shelters show considerable promise as tools for studying imperiled hellbender salamanders. Their full utility has not yet been fully reached in practice, however, because during initial trials shelters often became blocked by sediment or dislodged during high stream discharge events. To determine whether these challenges could be overcome, we deployed 438 artificial shelters of two different designs across 10 stream reaches and three rivers in the upper Tennessee River Drainage in 2013–2018. We recorded shelter entrance availability during surveys, and recorded which shelters became dislodged following high discharge events. We evaluated two hypotheses: (a) shelter availability was driven by shelter placement and maintenance frequency and (b) shelter stability was driven by shelter design and shelter placement. Shelters were available 78.6% of the time on average (range = 0–100%), and 88.6% (388 of 438) of shelters were stable across all high discharge events. Shelter availability was maximized by clearing sediment from shelter entrances at least once every 40 days (more often in impaired reaches with high siltation) and after large storm events, situating the shelter within 1 m of ≥5 boulders, and orienting shelters such that their entrances do not face directly downstream. Shelter stability with our initial shelter design was 77.5% (169 of 218), but approached 100% (219 of 220) for heavier (~40 kg vs. ~25 kg) shelters with recessed lids, and in reaches with abundant large boulders. Our findings demonstrate that with an improved design and careful placement, artificial shelters can serve as valuable tools for monitoring hellbenders in reaches with modest siltation.